Strictly Business

A Business Law Blog for Entrepreneurs, Startups, Venture Capital, and the Private Fund Industry.

  • About the Authors
    • Alexander J. Davie
    • Casey W. Riggs
    • J. Chandler Waits
    • Jennifer Wilson
    • Taylor K. Wilkins
  • Categories
    • Effective Attorney-Client Relationships
    • General Business Law
    • Intellectual Property
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Private Equity and Hedge Funds
    • Startups and Venture Capital
    • Technology
  • Guides
    • Exempt Reporting Adviser Filing Requirements
    • State Investment Adviser Registration

Founder Archives

The Pitfalls of Moonlighting in a Day Job for Startup Founders

January 18, 2016 by Alexander J. Davie

Many, if not most, founders have difficulty being able to afford to work full-time for their startup right from the start. But working in a day job while moonlighting at your venture presents some particularly dicey legal issues that can cause issues down the line.

In particular, moonlighting for your startup presents a significant threat to your startup’s intellectual property, especially if you’re currently working at a technology company. Many employers, especially technology companies and other IP-intensive businesses, require all employees to sign invention assignment agreements, which are often very broad and give your employer rights to any IP you create that relates to the business of your employer or any reasonably anticipated business of your employer. This is the case even if the IP was created on your own time and without the use of your employer’s facilities. [Read more…]

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Filed Under: Intellectual Property, Startups and Venture Capital Tagged With: Founder, Startups, Technology

Venture Capital Term Sheet Negotiation — Part 20: Founders’ Stock

March 24, 2015 by Alexander J. Davie

This post is the twentieth in a series giving practical advice to startups with respect to understanding and negotiating a venture capital term sheet.

In the prior nineteen posts, we provided an introduction to negotiation of the term sheet and discussed binding and non-binding provisions and discussed valuation, cap tables, and the price per share, dividends on preferred stock, liquidation preferences, the conversion rights and features of preferred stock, voting rights and investor protection provisions, anti-dilution provisions, anti-dilution carve-outs and “pay to play” provisions, redemption rights, registration rights,  management and information rights, preemptive rights, drag-along rights, representations and warranties, rights of first refusal and co-sale, closing conditions and expenses, non-competition and non-solicitation agreements, non-disclosure and developments agreements, and board matters. In this post, we will discuss founders’ stock.

[Read more…]

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Filed Under: Startups and Venture Capital Tagged With: Founder, Founders' Stock, Term Sheet, Venture Capital, Venture Capital Term Sheet, Vesting

Stock Options versus Stock Warrants – What’s the Difference?

November 2, 2012 by Casey W. Riggs

I frequently hear clients and some of their advisers talk about “stock options” and “stock warrants” and there is often considerable confusion between the two. In this post, I’ll briefly describe the major distinctions between these instruments and how each can be used in a privately held company. [Read more…]

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Filed Under: General Business Law Tagged With: Equity Compensation, Founder, Incentive Stock Options, Key Employee, Nonqualified Stock Options, Phantom Stock Plan, Restricted Stock, Stock Options, Warrants

Retaining Key Employees in a Privately-Held Company through Equity Compensation – Part 5: Accounting Implications

July 28, 2012 by Casey W. Riggs

This post is the fifth in a series exploring techniques to attract and retain key employees, directors, and other service providers of privately held companies through equity-based compensation arrangements and alternative arrangements that provide cash payments tied to the value of the company’s stock or ownership interests.

Previously, I provided an overview and discussed the tax treatment of various equity compensation arrangements typically used by corporations, such as stock options, restricted stock, phantom stock, and stock appreciation rights and the tax treatment of profits interests in entities taxed as partnerships (like LLCs). In this post, we’ll briefly discuss the accounting treatment for some of these vehicles (and in particular, the effects on the company’s P&L). While the details of accounting for stock-based compensation and deferred compensation plans are complex and certainly beyond the scope of this blog post, the basic concepts are important and should be considered before such awards are made. In particular, companies considering awards will want to have an understanding of the potential expenses that will be recognized on the company’s P&L in connection with an award and how those expenses might affect financial statements and agreements with third parties (e.g. financial covenants in a loan agreement).

[Read more…]

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Filed Under: Startups and Venture Capital Tagged With: Equity Compensation, Founder, Incentive Stock Options, Key Employee, Nonqualified Stock Options, Phantom Stock Plan, Restricted Stock, Stock Appreciation Rights, Stock Options

Retaining Key Employees in a Privately-Held Company through Equity Compensation – Part 4: “Profits Interests” in LLCs and Partnerships

July 6, 2012 by Casey W. Riggs

This post is the fourth in a series exploring techniques to attract and retain key employees, directors, and other service providers of privately held companies through equity-based compensation arrangements and alternative arrangements that provide cash payments tied to the value of the company’s stock or ownership interests.

Previously, I provided an overview and discussed the tax treatment of various equity compensation arrangements typically used by corporations, such as stock options, restricted stock, phantom stock, and stock appreciation rights. In this post, I’ll discuss a popular technique, called a “profits interest,” which is available to entities taxed as partnerships, such as limited liability companies (or “LLCs”). Profits interests can provide a tax efficient way to reward key service providers. Since LLCs are the most popular type of entity taxed as a partnership, for the rest of this post, I will assume that the entity in question is an LLC.

[Read more…]

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Filed Under: Startups and Venture Capital Tagged With: 83(b) Election, Equity Compensation, Founder, Key Employee, Limited Liability Company, Partnership, Profits Interest

Next Page »

About the editor

Alexander Davie image
Strictly Business is a business law blog for entrepreneurs, startups, venture capital, and the private fund industry. Its editor is Alexander J. Davie, an attorney at Riggs Davie PLC based in Nashville, Tennessee. His practice focuses on corporate, securities, and business law. He works mainly with technology companies, including startups and emerging companies, and private equity, venture capital, and hedge funds.
Contact Alex

Connect

Riggs Davie PLC logo

Categories

  • Effective Attorney-Client Relationships
  • General Business Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Private Equity and Hedge Funds
  • Startups and Venture Capital
  • Technology

Subscribe

    Sign up today to receive ongoing updates from Strictly Business.

    Copyright © 2011-20 - Alexander J. Davie
    Attorney Advertising | Privacy Policy